Skip to main content

Simon Collings - new poetry

Simon Collings



how then suggest



i
 
hidden somewhere as fit
for fragments
a semblance of outline
doubt referred
where a line might hold
a bulwark, tentative
‘this’ as possibility
or however subtracted
the gaps the same
determining a pattern
of precarious tenure
the horizontal anticipates
if nothing will add
once lost, echoes
thus an allegiance of
into its vagrant search

ii

was simply the choice of
signalling to us
the import here eludes
when leaned on formally
reflex extending
settlement masking a discord
how then suggest
by non-ritual gestures
if in this we can see
the pleasure mediated
configurations of
a departure hence
founded on avoidance
no avowal, on for when



aspects, with haziness

i
 
this search for form
of restitution
not simply the discovery
of superimpositions
as we search our bearings
united only within limits
barely, if narrowed
to the laying of
which here defines
reportings cast to chance
a progression out
of casual judgements
and might quickly then
for what balance
elaborates this further

 

ii
 
as by resisting all figures
if not as speech
but also mistaking
might uncover how
our calculus the territory of
a landscape feature
aspects, with haziness
allusions falling silent
as incitement to context
attention a given
this point a universe
reaction a distribution
confusing parallels
traced by a series of clues
yet still inhabiting



point as evidence
 

i
 
rumours, reached that
and that’s a sleep
with ease, suggests terrain
we least that others
have, or listening
is fluid and like completing
looks and moves on
the purpose to this other
a marking of
it all points there
encompassedmemory
the unreliable ‘we’
way around must
needs evolving, a process
rooted always

 

ii
 
or endlessly reconfiguring
field clearly there
no object so charted, the path
serves as viewpoint
as work we do unforced
point as evidence
some sort of a whole
a suspended system has
suddenly unfamiliar
or leading simply
arching, it goes on
point, not recognised as
the trail, guide to some
here, only the each
of feeling that, there



copyright © Simon Collings, 2019

 

Popular posts from this blog

Review - High and Lonesome: Three Books: Crozier, Prynne, James

Andrew Duncan High and Lonesome : Three Books: John James, Striking the Pavilion of Zero, J.H. Prynne, High Pink on Chrome ; Andrew Crozier, High Zero (Shearsman, 2021; edited Ian Brinton)  The reason why these three books from 1975-6 and 1978 are being republished together is straightforward. Crozier had named a work High Zero , and when I interviewed him in 2003 he conceded that it referred to High Pink and Striking the Pavilion of Zero , and that he had used lines from those two works as keys to develop the High Zero poems from. Publication together allows one to read across and recover a part of the composition process. High Zero was published in 1978, later than the two poems it is a response to. The founding moment is The English Intelligencer , in which all three of these poets took part. This was an attempt to recapitulate the development of Charles Olson, up to about 1950; he was seen as both the continuator of Pound and as having thought profoundly about geography. T

Essay - Whatever Happened to the Poetry Manifesto?

MARTIN STANNARD WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE POETRY MANIFESTO? Recently I tried writing an essay that had the working title 'Why the Meaning of a Poem is the Last Thing You Should Think About'. I felt like I had something to say. It began like this: I can't help but remember what my old angling tutor used to say: “Be careful when you open a can of worms." Of course, he didn’t say any such thing, and I never had an angling tutor, but writers, and perhaps especially poets, can say anything and get away with it, because . . . Actually, I'm not sure why. I'm not even sure if it's true. If it is, it shouldn’t be. And I'm not sure about that, either. I think it's probably best if we accept a certain degree of uncertainty and subjectivity and other words that suggest everything is open to argument and get on with this. Just because something is open to argument doesn't mean it's wrong. Later (about 3000 words later) I decided I was on to a loser.

Review - "Bright Angel Proof" by Nick Power

Charlie Baylis Bright Angel Proof, Nick Power (£10, erbacce press) In the spring of 2016 a writer from the small Northwestern town of Hoylake, Nick Power, took a trip flying around America on budget airlines, soaking in all its big ticket tourist attractions and gaudy glories. The trip, and Power’s poems about the trip, come together to form Bright Angel Proof , a collection which evokes beat generation myths of a mystical America, but behind the lines Power knows that the beat generation era is done and perhaps was never really there to begin with. Power is too late to join the ranks of Ginsburg, Kerouac et al but at least he suggests that he might have something to say, which is more than most contemporary poets. Power attracts attention as a kind of modern Burt Lancaster, an adventurer of compelling (North) West Coast vibes and easy going company who, like Lana Del Rey, has ‘feathers in his hair...c hurning out novels like Beat poetry on Amphetamines.’ Power’s companion on the