Skip to main content

Peter Larkin - poem extract


Peter Larkin

from "Bushily the Trees"

III

Unspurnables no anti-
tallness, just branch-
social singularities
pocket-sprung, single-
stem on a roll between
multi-branch
wood-laden however
pierced at sphere
where unsought
trees are over-bush-
ing ground berries

Is there a path from broken neck to bushhead?     is it the surround-band?     not oblique seal but indirect reel?
From bushes to tree its colonising column or greater the bespoke spread, resilient incurve
Bush outseeding trees along their own branch-poke    local crests do alert cluster


A tree huddling its
bush before the
leaf-strippers
tuned up, slightly
startled but still
bush-prone sheltering
its tree-radicals
does cloud round
with correlative tapers,
no such rush to
bush once at the top
of its tree-brow

Like a drone among masts preaching the new green murk     pass a prayer along well-tagged mass, snatch no labels

IV

Boast of a bush
is its tree-shot,
coasts the brush-away
from being at bay
in the woods
bushy proximity
between hemisphere
and cylinder, bio-
mass at its mod-
ular transfer column
no bushing hairy enough
to strangle the pole,
no trunk squat enough
but entangles branch-roll

Soar and lull of the unhindered call to bush     not a frame or neck but clasps an alliance of no more monopoly edges     at core this must be vertical hedge
A basin of foliage caught at the branches’ lair     put a bushcoat on the hulk of it     until all levels stratify on the round
Bushing-from not globalisation but a defect the expansion stress re-offers as shelter     sustainable bulbs sounding out other native all-rounders



Keep plumping for
world, a shine off multiple
inter-blade, coppiced
retro-glade
a nested thicket
with all the abbreviants
of its converted curves
not really populous
given its bulbous
vanishing points

A spell of tree blotch, a swathe of spinning oak however bushlike consistent     no notches encase or pin


V

Root, stem, branch, each
alone can’t breed much
muster, integral tree
must be left to its
most applied freak
neither mound nor
pillow but in its wiry
way pivots a
forward light
a tree’s stare at prayer,
integral fault-line
falls on its bushface,
flickers busy attunement,
every clump in phase

If diagonal skin (leaf) it sheets even more the properties of internal basketing     the buffer-zone is everywhere tree-intimate
Bushiness less than gauze but persistent daggings of thread     anywhere the tree doesn’t pull itself to but finds itself crimping across collateral shade
How tree-limbs flock to their bushy saddling     no other en bloc condition than this, no more parallels of accretion     equivalence itself is curvilinear advice


Same on same snap
selects to a feature
of inflated coil
cordage almost afloat,
stages of tree, bush-
right is crown concession
a tree fights shy
of fellow immensity,
these private tangles
are its co-propensity

The tree’s first profile not as contrite as this final bush     stag-head but strolling rib to lateral recovery


 VI


Some sort of circum-
fission, initial
departures, but the
interfenestration
most roofily planted
a bushy by-robe, cribs
the huddle that augurs
density before reversion
bush-waste not quite as
stagnant as thin tree,
a portage of green to
crest, same waves
haggardly to stay

Soft ruffs adjoining the prayer of exposing coil and flex     cruise between tree-zones which message their fore-lit scrimmaging of instilment
Girdles a thatch of horizontal hill     not the belly of the tree but prolonged munching of its limbs in glandular outfold
Neither bush direct from rock, the medium itself is growing trunk exception     an exclamation now at its lateral hubbub

Field light bursting
any tree-graze, in-
flamed bushy
excrescence
stretchmarks, little spurs,
one by two in layers,
no inordinate prayer
a foam less its banter,
this network or the deep
pendencies, relations
of relations to

How surrounded is a sprig or bud to be so translatable among upright stakes?     is what accompanies, not replicates, the gift of a tree



copyright © Peter Larkin, 2020


Popular posts from this blog

Review - High and Lonesome: Three Books: Crozier, Prynne, James

Andrew Duncan High and Lonesome : Three Books: John James, Striking the Pavilion of Zero, J.H. Prynne, High Pink on Chrome ; Andrew Crozier, High Zero (Shearsman, 2021; edited Ian Brinton)  The reason why these three books from 1975-6 and 1978 are being republished together is straightforward. Crozier had named a work High Zero , and when I interviewed him in 2003 he conceded that it referred to High Pink and Striking the Pavilion of Zero , and that he had used lines from those two works as keys to develop the High Zero poems from. Publication together allows one to read across and recover a part of the composition process. High Zero was published in 1978, later than the two poems it is a response to. The founding moment is The English Intelligencer , in which all three of these poets took part. This was an attempt to recapitulate the development of Charles Olson, up to about 1950; he was seen as both the continuator of Pound and as having thought profoundly about geography. T

Essay - Whatever Happened to the Poetry Manifesto?

MARTIN STANNARD WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE POETRY MANIFESTO? Recently I tried writing an essay that had the working title 'Why the Meaning of a Poem is the Last Thing You Should Think About'. I felt like I had something to say. It began like this: I can't help but remember what my old angling tutor used to say: “Be careful when you open a can of worms." Of course, he didn’t say any such thing, and I never had an angling tutor, but writers, and perhaps especially poets, can say anything and get away with it, because . . . Actually, I'm not sure why. I'm not even sure if it's true. If it is, it shouldn’t be. And I'm not sure about that, either. I think it's probably best if we accept a certain degree of uncertainty and subjectivity and other words that suggest everything is open to argument and get on with this. Just because something is open to argument doesn't mean it's wrong. Later (about 3000 words later) I decided I was on to a loser.

Review - "Bright Angel Proof" by Nick Power

Charlie Baylis Bright Angel Proof, Nick Power (£10, erbacce press) In the spring of 2016 a writer from the small Northwestern town of Hoylake, Nick Power, took a trip flying around America on budget airlines, soaking in all its big ticket tourist attractions and gaudy glories. The trip, and Power’s poems about the trip, come together to form Bright Angel Proof , a collection which evokes beat generation myths of a mystical America, but behind the lines Power knows that the beat generation era is done and perhaps was never really there to begin with. Power is too late to join the ranks of Ginsburg, Kerouac et al but at least he suggests that he might have something to say, which is more than most contemporary poets. Power attracts attention as a kind of modern Burt Lancaster, an adventurer of compelling (North) West Coast vibes and easy going company who, like Lana Del Rey, has ‘feathers in his hair...c hurning out novels like Beat poetry on Amphetamines.’ Power’s companion on the