Skip to main content

Adrian Buckner - Four Poems (from SeeSaw)

Adrian Buckner

Four Poems (from SeeSaw)

Giotto

The Entry into Jerusalem, c.1305

I am a smiling donkey
I am practically giggling
With the Good News

When the golden age arrives
For children’s illustrated books

I will trot from this fresco
Onto those pages

And wreathe the unlettered
In smiles again



Vermeer

Study of a Young Woman, 1665-7

When I come to the party in New York
Be honest about what you see
Be clear about your feelings

Two hundred years of disregard
Must count for something

I come with nothing behind me
I waited for you to know

The harmony of my discretion
The splendour of his slowness




Chardin (to Warhol)

Basket of wild strawberries, 1761

Andy
May I offer
Something for your private collection?

A glass of water
As you say Cool

And strawberry strawberry
Strawberry strawberry

Or would you prefer some more apricots
In a jar with no label?




Duchamp

Fountain, 1917

My name is Rachel Mutt
I work from four to eight three times a day
Nine days a week fifteen months of the year

Cleaning lavatories in an Institute of Higher Education
In the English Midlands

Life has dealt me seven truckloads of shit
Leaving me with nothing but pride in my work

Ignoring the framed sheet above the hand dryers
I signed today my very own piece of Art



NOTE:

In 2019, I wrote a short poem about Mark Rothko, prompted by his untitled yellow painting in The Tate at St. Ives. In the week following I wrote another poem on Giotto’s The Entry into Jerusalem. In the drafting I nudged this second piece into the same nine line and stanza form as the Rothko poem. Though lightly undertaken, this brief exercise in my notebook provided the impetus for a series that I immediately wanted to realise. Each poem would be a miniature canvas – type on paper if you like – a scaffold erected against a work of art that compelled my eye and imagination

I strive to include something in each poem that can be termed, as Elizabeth Bishop might have put it, accurate. Every other aspect - of idea, thought, tone of devotion or speculative fancy - negotiates, in the absence of the image, with a reader’s level of interest, knowledge and curiosity.

Some poems about paintings are marred by solemnity and an ordinary, laboured observation.  I am conscious of a different temptation – brief anachronistic ironies – and hope this is not a prevailing note, though I don’t mind if it is one of the notes.  My modest ambition is that each and all can be read, as Auden has it, ‘without contempt’ as the responses of an individual in front of a work of art. And though part of my ambition is to look anew, the instinct to admire is equally dear to me. 

Lytton (Strachey) was a great reader. Holroyd (Michael, his biographer) tends to describe this as idleness, an attitude which Lytton himself shared. But reading is not idleness – any more than listening to music or looking at pictures – it is the passive, receptive side of civilization without which the active and creative would be meaningless. It is the immortal spirit of the dead realized within the bodies of the living. It is sacramental.

Stephen Spender Journals 1939 – 1983. 4th January 1980

The spirit in these lines is evident in Spender’s poem “The truly Great” – mocked by Thom Gunn –

I think continually of those who were truly great (Spender)

I think of all the toughs through history
And thank heaven they lived, continually.
I praise the overdogs from Alexander
To those who would not play with Stephen Spender.
(Gunn)

Gunn had too fine a mind and was too good a poet to nag that theme for long, though contemporary critics of canonical ordering are not so reticent, far angrier and certainly less amusing.

What Spender’s poem and diary entry - nodding to each other across the decades of his literary life – express so attractively to this reader is the proposal that in the artist (and reader, looker, listener) modesty and grandeur of vision are creative companions.

Many of the works of art I have responded to in these poems are truly great. I have been thinking about them, continually. I offer modest poems. That offering is the only accessibility I seek in their presentation here.

Adrian Buckner        July 2021

 

Copyright © Adrian Buckner, 2021


Popular posts from this blog

Review - High and Lonesome: Three Books: Crozier, Prynne, James

Andrew Duncan High and Lonesome : Three Books: John James, Striking the Pavilion of Zero, J.H. Prynne, High Pink on Chrome ; Andrew Crozier, High Zero (Shearsman, 2021; edited Ian Brinton)  The reason why these three books from 1975-6 and 1978 are being republished together is straightforward. Crozier had named a work High Zero , and when I interviewed him in 2003 he conceded that it referred to High Pink and Striking the Pavilion of Zero , and that he had used lines from those two works as keys to develop the High Zero poems from. Publication together allows one to read across and recover a part of the composition process. High Zero was published in 1978, later than the two poems it is a response to. The founding moment is The English Intelligencer , in which all three of these poets took part. This was an attempt to recapitulate the development of Charles Olson, up to about 1950; he was seen as both the continuator of Pound and as having thought profoundly about geography. T

Essay - Whatever Happened to the Poetry Manifesto?

MARTIN STANNARD WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE POETRY MANIFESTO? Recently I tried writing an essay that had the working title 'Why the Meaning of a Poem is the Last Thing You Should Think About'. I felt like I had something to say. It began like this: I can't help but remember what my old angling tutor used to say: “Be careful when you open a can of worms." Of course, he didn’t say any such thing, and I never had an angling tutor, but writers, and perhaps especially poets, can say anything and get away with it, because . . . Actually, I'm not sure why. I'm not even sure if it's true. If it is, it shouldn’t be. And I'm not sure about that, either. I think it's probably best if we accept a certain degree of uncertainty and subjectivity and other words that suggest everything is open to argument and get on with this. Just because something is open to argument doesn't mean it's wrong. Later (about 3000 words later) I decided I was on to a loser.

Review - "Bright Angel Proof" by Nick Power

Charlie Baylis Bright Angel Proof, Nick Power (£10, erbacce press) In the spring of 2016 a writer from the small Northwestern town of Hoylake, Nick Power, took a trip flying around America on budget airlines, soaking in all its big ticket tourist attractions and gaudy glories. The trip, and Power’s poems about the trip, come together to form Bright Angel Proof , a collection which evokes beat generation myths of a mystical America, but behind the lines Power knows that the beat generation era is done and perhaps was never really there to begin with. Power is too late to join the ranks of Ginsburg, Kerouac et al but at least he suggests that he might have something to say, which is more than most contemporary poets. Power attracts attention as a kind of modern Burt Lancaster, an adventurer of compelling (North) West Coast vibes and easy going company who, like Lana Del Rey, has ‘feathers in his hair...c hurning out novels like Beat poetry on Amphetamines.’ Power’s companion on the